# Mole Concept

In chemistry the mole is a fundamental unit in the Système
International d'Unités, the SI system, and it is used to
measure the amount of substance. This quantity is sometimes referred to as
the
*
chemical amount.
*
In Latin
*
mole
*
means a "massive heap" of material. It is convenient to
think of a chemical mole as such.

Visualizing a mole as a pile of particles, however, is just one way to
understand this concept. A sample of a substance has a mass, volume
(generally used with gases), and number of particles that is proportional
to the chemical amount (measured in moles) of the sample. For example, one
mole of oxygen gas (O
_{
2
}
) occupies a volume of 22.4 L at standard temperature and pressure (STP;
0°C and 1 atm), has a mass of 31.998 grams, and contains about
6.022 × 10
^{
23
}
molecules of oxygen. Measuring one of these quantities allows the
calculation of the others and this is frequently done in stoichiometry.

The
*
mole
*
is to the
*
amount of substance
*
(or chemical amount) as the
*
gram
*
is to
*
mass.
*
Like other units of the SI system, prefixes can be used with the mole, so
it is permissible to refer to 0.001 mol as 1 mmol just as 0.001 g is
equivalent to 1 mg.

## Formal Definition

According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the Fourteenth Conférence Générale des Poids et Mesures established the definition of the mole in 1971.

The mole is the amount of a substance of a system which contains as many elementary entities as there are atoms in 0.012 kilogram of carbon-12; its symbol is "mol." When the mole is used, the elementary entities must be specified and may be atoms, molecules, ions, electrons, other particles, or specified groups of such particles.

## One Interpretation: A Specific Number of Particles

When a quantity of particles is to be described, mole is a grouping unit
analogous to groupings such as pair, dozen, or gross, in that all of these
words represent specific numbers of objects. The main differences between
the mole and the other grouping units are the magnitude of the number
represented and how that number is obtained. One mole is an amount of
substance containing Avogadro's number of particles.
Avogadro's number is equal to 602,214,199,000,000,000,000,000 or
more simply, 6.02214199 × 10
^{
23
}
.

Unlike pair, dozen, and gross, the exact number of particles in a mole cannot be counted. There are several reasons for this. First, the particles are too small and cannot be seen even with a microscope. Second, as naturally occurring carbon contains approximately 98.90% carbon-12, the sample would need to be purified to remove every atom of carbon-13 and carbon-14. Third, as the number of particles in a mole is tied to the mass of exactly 12 grams of carbon-12, a balance would need to be constructed that could determine if the sample was one atom over or under exactly 12 grams. If the first two requirements were met, it would take one million machines counting one million atoms each second more than 19,000 years to complete the task.

Obviously, if the number of particles in a mole cannot be counted, the
value must be measured indirectly and with every measurement there is some
degree of uncertainty. Therefore, the number of particles in a mole,
Avogadro's constant (
*
N
*
_{
A
}
), can only be approximated through experimentation, and thus its reported
values will vary slightly (at the tenth decimal place) based on the
measurement method used. Most methods agree to four significant figures,
so
*
N
*
_{
A
}
is generally said to equal 6.022 × 10
^{
23
}
particles per mole, and this value is usually sufficient for solving
textbook problems. Another key point is that the formal definition of a
mole does not include a value for Avogadro's constant and this is
probably due to the inherent uncertainty in its measurement. As for the
difference between Avogadro's constant and Avogadro's
number, they are numerically equivalent, but the former has the unit of
mol
^{
−1
}
whereas the latter is a pure number with no unit.

## A Second Interpretation: A Specific Mass

Atoms and molecules are incredibly small and even a tiny chemical sample contains an unimaginable number of them. Therefore, counting the number of atoms or molecules in a sample is impossible. The multiple interpretations of the mole allow us to bridge the gap between the submicroscopic world of atoms and molecules and the macroscopic world that we can observe.

To determine the chemical amount of a sample, we use the
substance's
*
molar mass,
*
the mass per mole of particles. We will use carbon-12 as an example
because it is the standard for the formal definition of the mole.
According to the definition, one mole of carbon-12 has a mass of exactly
12 grams. Consequently, the molar mass of carbon-12 is 12 g/mol. However,
the molar mass for the element carbon is 12.011 g/mol. Why are they
different? To answer that question, a few terms need to be clarified.

On the Periodic Table, you will notice that most of the atomic weights
listed are not round numbers. The atomic weight is a weighted average of
the atomic masses of an element's natural isotopes. For example,
bromine has two natural isotopes with atomic masses of 79 u and 81 u. The
unit
*
u
*
represents the atomic mass unit and is used in place of grams because the
value would be inconveniently small. These two isotopes of bromine are
present in nature in almost equal amounts, so the atomic weight of the
element bromine is 79.904. (i.e., nearly 80, the arithmetic mean of 79 and
81). A similar situation exists for chlorine, but chlorine-35 is almost
three times as abundant as chlorine-37, so the atomic weight of chlorine
is 35.4527. Technically, atomic weights are ratios of the average atomic
mass to the unit
*
u
*
and that
is why they do not have units. Sometimes atomic weights are given the
unit
*
u
*
, but this is not quite correct according to the International Union of
Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC).

To find the molar mass of an element or compound, determine the atomic,
molecular, or formula weight and express that value as g/mol. For bromine
and chlorine, the molar masses are 79.904 g/mol and 35.4527 g/mol,
respectively. Sodium chloride (NaCl) has a formula weight of 58.443
(atomic weight of Na + atomic weight of Cl) and a molar mass of 58.443
g/mol. Formaldehyde (CH
_{
2
}
O) has a molecular weight of 30.03 (atomic weight of C + 2 [atomic weight
of H]) + atomic weight of O] and a molar mass of 30.03 g/mol.

The concept of molar mass enables chemists to measure the number of
submicroscopic particles in a sample without counting them directly simply
by determining the chemical amount of a sample. To find the chemical
amount of a sample, chemists measure its mass and divide by its molar
mass. Multiplying the chemical amount (in moles) by Avogadro's
constant (
*
N
*
_{
A
}
) yields the number of particles present in the sample.

Occasionally, one encounters gram-atomic mass (GAM), gram-formula mass
(GFM), and gram-molecular mass (GMM). These terms are functionally the
same as molar mass. For example, the GAM of an element is the mass in
grams of a sample containing
*
N
*
_{
A
}
atoms and is equal to the element's atomic weight expressed in
grams. GFM and GMM are defined similarly. Other terms you may encounter
are formula mass and molecular mass. Interpret these as formula weight and
molecular weight, respectively, but with the units of
*
u.
*

## Avogadro's Hypothesis

Some people think that Amedeo Avogadro (1776–1856) determined the number of particles in a mole and that is why the quantity is known as Avogadro's number. In reality Avogadro built a theoretical foundation for determining accurate atomic and molecular masses. The concept of a mole did not even exist in Avogadro's time.

Much of Avogadro's work was based on that of Joseph-Louis Gay-Lussac (1778–1850). Gay-Lussac developed the law of combining volumes that states: "In any chemical reaction involving gaseous substances the volumes of the various gases reacting or produced are in the ratios of small whole numbers." (Masterton and Slowinski, 1977, p. 105) Avogadro reinterpreted Gay-Lussac's findings and proposed in 1811 that (1) some molecules were diatomic and (2) "equal volumes of all gases at the same temperature and pressure contain the same number of molecules" (p. 40). The second proposal is what we refer to as Avogadro's hypothesis.

The hypothesis provided a simple method of determining relative molecular
weights because equal volumes of two different gases at the same
temperature and pressure contained the same number of particles, so the
ratio of the masses of the gas samples must also be that of their particle
masses. Unfortunately, Avogadro's hypothesis was largely ignored
until Stanislao Cannizzaro (1826–1910) advocated using it to
calculate relative atomic masses or atomic weights. Soon after the 1
^{
st
}
International Chemical Congress at Karlsrule in 1860, Cannizzaro's
proposal was accepted and a scale of atomic weights was established.

To understand how Avogadro's hypothesis can be used to determine relative atomic and molecular masses, visualize two identical boxes with oranges in one and grapes in the other. The exact number of fruit in each box is not known, but you believe that there are equal numbers of fruit in each box (Avogadro's hypothesis). After subtracting the masses of the boxes, you have the masses of each fruit sample and can determine the mass ratio between the oranges and the grapes. By assuming that there are equal numbers of fruit in each box, you then know the average mass ratio between a grape and an orange, so in effect you have calculated their relative masses (atomic masses). If you chose either the grape or the orange as a standard, you could eventually determine a scale of relative masses for all fruit.

## A Third Interpretation: A Specific Volume

By extending Avogadro's hypothesis, there is a specific volume of
gas that contains
*
N
*
_{
A
}
gas particles for a given temperature and pressure and that volume should
be the same for all gases. For an ideal gas, the volume of one mole at STP
(0°C and 1.000 atm) is 22.41 L, and several real gases (hydrogen,
oxygen, and nitrogen) come very close to this value.

## The Size of Avogadro's Number

To provide some idea of the enormity of Avogadro's number, consider
some examples. Avogadro's number of water drops (twenty drops per
mL) would fill a rectangular column of water 9.2 km (5.7 miles) by 9.2 km
(5.7 miles) at the base and reaching to the moon at perigee (closest
distance to Earth). Avogadro's number of water drops would cover
the all of the land in the United States to a depth of roughly 3.3 km
(about 2 miles). Avogadro's number of pennies placed in a
rectangular stack roughly 6 meters by 6 meters at the base would stretch
for about 9.4 × 10
^{
12
}
km and extend outside our solar system. It would take light nearly a year
to travel from one end of the stack to the other.

## History

Long before the mole concept was developed, there existed the idea of chemical equivalency in that specific amounts of various substances could react in a similar manner and to the same extent with another substance. Note that the historical equivalent is not the same as its modern counterpart, which involves electric charge. Also, the historical equivalent is not the same as a mole, but the two concepts are related in that they both indicate that different masses of two substances can react with the same amount of another substance.

The idea of chemical equivalents was stated by Henry Cavendish in 1767, clarified by Jeremias Richter in 1795, and popularized by William Wollaston in 1814. Wollaston applied the concept to elements and defined it in such a way that one equivalent of an element corresponded to its atomic mass. Thus, when Wollaston's equivalent is expressed in grams, it is identical to a mole. It is not surprising then that the word "mole" is derived from "molekulargewicht" (German, meaning "molecular weight") and was coined in 1901 or 1902.

**
SEE ALSO
**
Avogadro, Amedeo
;
Cannizzaro, Stanislao
;
Cavendish, Henry
;
Gay-Lussac, Joseph-Louis
.

*
Nathan J. Barrows
*

## Bibliography

Atkins, Peter, and Jones, Loretta (2002).
*
Chemical Principles
*
, 2nd edition. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Lide, David R., ed. (2000).
*
The CRC Handbook of Chemistry & Physics
*
, 81st edition. New York: CRC Press.

Masterton, William L., and Slowinski, Emil J. (1977).
*
Chemical Principles
*
, 4th edition. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.

### Internet Resources

National Institute of Standards and Technology. "Unit of Amount of Substance (Mole)." Available from http://www.nist.gov .

e.g. taken 1 mol water equal to 18 gm of water whtch equal to its molecular weight.

20scholar coaching classe, A ADVANCE SCIENCE ACEDEMY. NEWASA

reply on 9766782131 (INDIA)

Avogadro's number is dimensionless. By contrast, the Avogadro constant is the amount-specific number of entities, i.e. N(S)/n(S), where N(S) is the total number of entities in a sample of a (chemically homogeneous) substance, S, and n(S) is the corresponding amount of substance. The reciprocal of this, the number-specific amount of substance, n(S)/N(S), is the amount of substance of a single entity, i.e. the entity itself. The numerical value of the Avogadro constant depends on the units used for amount of substance. So if NA = N(S)/n(S) and ent = n(S)/N(S), we see that NA = 1 per ent = AN per mole, where AN = g/Da is Avogadro's number.

Avogadro's number is (1/1000) kg/Da. Currently, the kilogram is defined as the mass of the international prototype of the kilogram, m(K); the dalton is one-twelfth the mass of the carbon-12 atom, Da = ma(12C)/12. So AN = (12/1000) m(K)/ma(12C), approximately 6.022141794x10^23.

one mole is equal to 6.023*10^23 particles

THANKS ONCE AGAIN.

Read more: Mole Concept - Chemistry Encyclopedia - reaction, water, elements, examples, gas, number, symbol, mass, atom, Formal Definition, One Interpretation, A Second Interpretation, Avogadros Hypothesis http://www.chemistryexplained.com/Ma-Na/Mole-Concept.html#ixzz15AI7ygiJ

I read in the 'NCERT' that the value of Avagadro Constant was 6.0221367 * 10 to the power 23 ...

Is there any diffrence in what you told and what NCERT says ???

2.which has more number of atoms,100g of socium or 100g ofiron(atomic mass of na=23u,fe=56u).

and what is it's value?

how we will know abt avg at.mass..?

m(X) = N(X)ma(X) = N(X)Ar(X) Da

But we would like this in grams, so we divide and multiply by g:

m(X) = [N(X)/(g/Da)]Ar(X) g

where we see the appearance of the characteristic dimensionless parameter, the gram-to-dalton mass-unit ratio, g/Da. This is where the Avogadro number (not "constant") comes from: Av = g/Da = (0.001 kg)/Da, exactly, regardless of how the kilogram and dalton are actually defined. We now have, in dimensionless form, a relationship between the substance mass and the total number of entities:

m(X)/[Ar(X) g] = N(X)/Av

Now look at the amount of substance, n(X). This is the same as an aggregate of entities. If "ent" represents (the existence of) one entity and there are N(X) entities, then the aggregate is N(X) ent, where we take ent to be an atomic-scale unit for amount of substance. So the amount-of-substance equation is, quite simply:

n(X) = N(X) ent

Rewriting this so that we can relate n(X) to m(X), we must use exactly the same dimensionless parameter, Av, in normalizing N(X):

n(X) = [N(X)/Av][Av ent]

N(X)/Av is a dimensionless quantity of order one. Av ent is a macroscopic constant with the dimension of amount of substance forming a natural macroscopic unit for amount of substance. We call this the mole:

mol = Av ent, exactly = (g/Da) ent, exactly

--one mole is exactly an Avogadro number of entities. [This is not a mass; nor is it a number; it is a (particular) number of entities--tangible stuff.] Note that this means that:

Da/ent = g/mol = kg/kmol, exactly

We now have:

n(X) = N(X)/Av mol

We can now combine the substance-mass and amount-of-substance equations in an easily comprehended dimensionless form:

m(X)/[Ar(X) g] = N(X)/Av = n(X)/mol

For a molecular (or other) substance, we replace Ar(X) by the relative molecular (formula) mass, Mr(X). Note that the "Avogadro constant" has not appeared in any of this--it is not needed! However, in order to understand what it means, we use the definition:

N_A = N(X)/n(X)

--the number of entities per amount of substance. Clearly, from the above, we see that:

N_A = 1/ent (one per entity) = Av/mol (one Avogadro number per mole)

Finally, since the dalton is (currently) defined as one-twelfth the mass of the carbon-12 atom, Da = ma(12C)/12, we see that:

Av = g/Da = (0.001 kg)/[ma(12C)/12] = [0.012 kg]/ma(12C)

This is "the number of atoms in exactly 0.012 kilogram of carbon 12" as used in the statement of the SI mole definition.

Cheers,

Benny.

What is meant, if said (written) correctly, is that a mass of one mole of water is (approximately) 18 g. And the number of molecules comprising one mole of water (or anything else) is (approximately) 6.02 x 10^23. The fundamental stoichiometric equations tell us what we need to know for a substance consisting of an aggregate of entities of kind X:

z(X) = m(X)/[Er(X) g] = N(X)/Av = n(X)/mol

where Er(X) is the relative entity mass, Er(X) = ma(X)/Da [usually written as Ar(X) for an atom or Mr(X) for a molecule, formula unit or other specified kind of entity]; and Av is the Avogadro number, Av = 6.022 141 29 x 10^23, rounded appropriately. If ideal-gas conditions are valid, we can extend the these relationships as follows:

z(X) = [p(X)V(X)/T(X)]/(kAv)

where k is the Boltzmann constant, k = 1.380 6488 x 10^-23 J/K. The product kAv is 8.314 462 J/K. As an exercise, if you substitute atmospheric pressure, patm = 101.325 kPa and the ice-point temperature, Tice = 273.15 K and n = 1 mol (or N = Av or m = Er g)--i.e., z = 1--you can find the corresponding reference volume: Vref = 22.413 968 L.

By the way, the notation "z" comes from a 1905 paper by Albert Einstein; "z" represents "number of" (the German word for number being zahl). Einstein used z as "the number of gram molecules"--a gram molecule being an old name for Mr(X) g [Ar(X) g was a gram atom]; these are parametric mass units, with a different numerical value for each X; also known as "chemical mass units."

Cheers,

Benny.

Why cant we use relative atomic mass instead of writing mole directly??

If one mole is collection of particle equal in number as no. of atoms in 12 gm carbon then every atom, molecule and ions have same measurement, isn't it??

with animation.

How we have taken out mass of hydrogen 1.008amu by using this scale?

which is in excess